Hello again Milind,
From previous threads in this Forum, we are aware that you said you are using copper scrap with no Electrolytic Tough Pitch (ETP) copper. The following question was then asked of you (November 10, 2009
www.wirenet.org/forum/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=12&Topic=754 ) by Spectre07: "Not to play with words but is your scrap 99.96% pure copper scrap or is your copper scrap 99.96 pure copper?" You never replied to this query or provided us with any other information and this left us all scratching our heads.
Moreover we have no idea as to where your copper scrap is coming from and how much oxide, sulfate,sulfide and other contaminants are on the surface this scrap. We also don't know the average size of your scrap pieces of copper and their history before being reclaimed in your process.
I personally suspect your problem is copper contamination by perhaps copper alloys or other metals but it seems to us that it is impossible for anyone to resolve this issue because of the great percentage of the scrap copper being used. Everything is on "shifting sand" so to speak.
The only way to get back on a firm footing is to experiment with 100% Electrolytic Tough Pitch (ETP) copper and thereby take all of the metallurgical variables out of your problem.
ETP C11000 is the most popular form of pure copper and is the standard electrical wire grade of copper (C11000). This grade contains 99.95% Cu, 0.03% O2, and less than 50 ppm metallic impurities. It has a high electrical conductivity, in excess of 100% IACS. In the as cast form it is called electrolytic tough pitch (ETP) copper.
Please let us know how that experiment worked out. Thank you.
Regards
Peter J. Stewart-Hay
Principal
Stewart-Hay Associates
www.Stewart-Hay.com
519 641-3212