Hello again cabledesigner,
Unfortunately you misunderstood what I said and I must apologize for that. There was no anger or displeasure in my answer to you and I was not offended by your question in the slightest. Please be clear in that.
However, saying that, the scope of your question is global and would require a tremendous amount of writing to answer. For example, you have not limited your question to the closure of bare or insulated wire, small insulated wires or fibers like telephone cable or optical fiber cable, the closure of large diameter insulated power cable legs, the closure of overhead conductor like ACSR, building wire conductor, Milliken conductor or a multitude of other bare and insulated wire products.
Likewise we just do not know what your experience and training is and again what wire and cable products you are specifically focused on. The fastest and most economical method of obtaining the information you are after however is to purchase the books we already recommended.
It is not the purpose of the WAI Forums to become a training center for readers around the World as there are other venues for that. For example, there are very good technical books as we already pointed out, lots of consultants, seminars and webinars. We are not in competition with them.
For your basic information however:
In general, the planetary machine family includes classical designs (rotating pay-offs), twist compensated drum twisters, twist compensated single and double twist bunchers, planetary quadders and tubular stranders.
Likewise the rigid machine family includes classical designs (rotating pay-offs), drum twisters, twinners, quadders and single and double twist bunchers and stranders.
The difference between rigid and planetary stranding and cabling is the introduced back twist (torsion) in rigid stranding and cabling. Planetary stranding and cabling is often described as "having or with back twist", meaning that the inherent back twist or torsion in rigid stranding has been removed.
S-Z stranding is really a form of rigid stranding (Although some may argue that it is more like tubular stranding.) with regularly sequenced reversals so that the geometric sum of back twists equals essentially zero over the entire length of the cable.
Regards
Peter J. Stewart-Hay
Principal
Stewart-Hay Associates
www.Stewart-Hay.com
519 641-3212